An exhausting international negotiation session on climate change concluded Sunday with an agreement among countries to take on more ambitious goals. That agreement, however, failed to resolve the main issues on the table, like creating rules for trading carbon emissions credits and helping developing countries pay for climate damages.
本次關(guān)于氣候變化的國(guó)際談判會(huì)議令人筋疲力盡，周日終于接近尾聲。各國(guó)達(dá)成了一項(xiàng)協(xié)議，要設(shè)定更加宏偉的目標(biāo)。但提交的主要議題在這項(xiàng)協(xié)議中并未得到解決，如制定碳排放信用交易規(guī)則，以及幫助發(fā)展中國(guó)家補(bǔ)償其對(duì)氣候造成的破壞。

Almost 200 countries at the two-week United Nations meeting known as COP25 did approve a statement calling on them to do more to fight climate change by next year, when the next round of national commitments to curb greenhouse gas emissions under the Paris climate agreement are due.
這次為期兩周的聯(lián)合國(guó)會(huì)議被稱為《聯(lián)合國(guó)氣候變化框架公約》締約方大會(huì)，與會(huì)的約200個(gè)國(guó)家都通過(guò)了一份聲明，聲明呼吁他們?cè)诿髂曛安扇「啻胧﹣?lái)應(yīng)對(duì)氣候變化，屆時(shí)《巴黎氣候協(xié)定》中各國(guó)下一輪溫室氣體減排承諾將到期。

But delegates could hardly agree on much else at the longest meeting in the 25-year history of these annual climate talks, which overshot its scheduled end by more than 40 hours.
但在此次會(huì)議上代表們無(wú)法就其他內(nèi)容達(dá)成一致。本次會(huì)議在年度氣候談判25年歷史上持續(xù)時(shí)間最長(zhǎng)，超出預(yù)定時(shí)間40多小時(shí)。

The negotiations this year were meant to nail down the outstanding issues in implementing the Paris climate agreement, but they came at an especially difficult time for many of the countries at the table. Countries like Chile and France are facing civil unrest back home. The United Kingdom held a general election during the talks. And India faces a slowing economy.
今年的談判旨在解決《巴黎氣候協(xié)定》執(zhí)行過(guò)程中尚未解決的問(wèn)題，但很多與會(huì)國(guó)家正處于極度困難時(shí)期，智利和法國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)騷亂，談判期間英國(guó)正值大選，印度經(jīng)濟(jì)放緩。

One of the toughest negotiations was over a section of the Paris climate agreement known as Article 6 that governs international carbon markets.
談判中最困難的部分就是《巴黎氣候協(xié)定》第6條，該條款對(duì)國(guó)際碳市場(chǎng)有影響。

Done right, it could serve as a vehicle for countries to adopt more ambitious goals for cutting their greenhouse gas emissions by allowing them to pay for reductions in emissions where they are most effective, which may not be inside their own borders. But done poorly, such a system could delay — or even reverse — progress in fighting climate change. Badly designed credits could fail to deliver the promised emissions cuts, or accounting loopholes could lead to double counting of credits.
如果得以合理執(zhí)行，就可以成為一種手段，幫助各國(guó)實(shí)現(xiàn)更為宏偉的減排目標(biāo)，允許各國(guó)在最有效的減排領(lǐng)域?yàn)闇p排買單，范圍可能并不局限于國(guó)內(nèi)。但如果執(zhí)行不利，這一體系會(huì)延緩應(yīng)對(duì)氣候變化的進(jìn)程，甚至還會(huì)起到反作用。糟糕的信用不能兌現(xiàn)減排承諾，會(huì)計(jì)漏洞也可導(dǎo)致信用的重復(fù)計(jì)算。

Countries came to the table with different priorities for how to structure these markets, and the rules they should use, but almost all of them left disappointed that the issue was once again left unsettled. “Regretfully we couldn’t get to an agreement on this important article,” said Carolina Schmidt, president of the COP.
在構(gòu)建這些市場(chǎng)以及應(yīng)遵守的規(guī)則方面，參與談判的國(guó)家重要性不同。但此次這一問(wèn)題又沒(méi)有得到解決，幾乎所有國(guó)家都很失望。本次會(huì)議的主席Carolina Schmidt說(shuō)：“很遺憾，我們未能就這一重要條款達(dá)成協(xié)議?！?/div>

?

翻譯：菲菲