Hints:
這是一篇批評盲目建造水壩的文章
World Bank?
Narmada Dam?
Aswan
5s和7s處有連字符
Meanwhile, in India, the World Bank has given the go-ahead to the even more wrong-headed Narmada Dam. And the bank has done this even though its advisors say the dam will cause hardship for the powerless and environmental destruction. The benefits are for the powerful, but they are far from guaranteed. Proper, scientific study of the impacts of dams and of the cost and benefits of controlling water can help to resolve these conflicts. Hydroelectric power and flood control and irrigation are possible without building monster dams. But when you are dealing with myths, it is hard to be either proper, or scientific. It is time that the world learned the lessons of Aswan. You don't need a dam to be saved.
與此同時，世界銀行已經(jīng)貸款給印度來建造問題更多的納爾馬達大壩。盡管世界銀行的顧問指出，該大壩將給平民帶來苦難，而且會破壞那里的環(huán)境，但世界銀行依然一意孤行。大壩只會給有權(quán)有勢者帶來利益，而且這種利益也遠遠得不到保障。 對于水壩的影響作用、水壩控制水流的成本和收益進行恰當而科學的研究能夠有助于解決這些沖突。水力發(fā)電，治理洪水以及灌溉即使不建大型水壩也是可能的。但當你相信神話時就很難做到合理或科學?，F(xiàn)在是世界吸取阿斯旺大壩教訓的時候了。我們未必要通過大壩來拯救自己。