對(duì)文本音頻等有任何疑問(wèn)，請(qǐng)?jiān)诖蠹?/span>留言板留言或是給月光站內(nèi)短消息~~~




?簡(jiǎn)介?

前靈媒Jane為找到殺害自己妻女的血腥約翰（Red John）, 成為了Lisbon調(diào)查小組的一名獨(dú)立顧問(wèn)。

?劇情?

Jane和Lisbon到雙胞胎的家里，Jane直截了當(dāng)?shù)馗芎φ吒赣H說(shuō)Maya活下來(lái)的機(jī)會(huì)很小，Lisbon責(zé)怪他太過(guò)殘忍。Jane說(shuō)這個(gè)家庭一定和RJ有一定私人恩怨。

?

?

?

Hints:
Red John
m.o.
CBI
kinda

?

Why so cruel? Statistically, it's dad that did it. Well, since when do you care about statistics? I just wanted to raise his pulse a little. Hold on. This is a Red John case. The cutting style, the painted toenails, the skywriting, you put it all together, it's hard to dismiss. Yeah, it's Red John, all right, but someone else is involved. Else, why would he change his m.o. so radically? Skywriting? He wanted to make sure that the CBI, that you, would be put on this case. He's obviously trying to lure you into some kinda trap. Well, that's part of it, but why take them from a car instead of catching them at home alone, like he's always done before? And why two victims at once? Twins? why break pattern? Well, he's broken pattern once before. Yes, because it was personal. He wanted to punish me. I don't think these girls are random targets. I think there's something personal behind this. Red John either knows them or knows someone close to them.
為什么這么殘忍？ 據(jù)統(tǒng)計(jì)，一般都是父親干的。 你什么時(shí)候開(kāi)始相信統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)了？ 我只是想讓他緊張一下。 等等，這是血腥約翰的案子。 殺人的方式，染血的腳趾甲，空中的圖畫(huà)。你把這些結(jié)合起來(lái)，就絕非巧合。 是的，是血腥約翰，沒(méi)錯(cuò)。但有他人牽涉其中，不然為什么要徹底改變殺人方式？ 空中作畫(huà)？ 他想確保加州調(diào)查局，也就是你，參與此案。 顯然，他是想引你入套。 那時(shí)一部分，但為什么把他們帶走，而不是趁他們獨(dú)自在家的時(shí)候呢？就像他以前一樣？ 為什么一次兩名受害者，還是雙胞胎？為什么打破慣例呢？ 他以前也打破過(guò)一次。 是的，但那時(shí)針對(duì)我。 他想懲罰我。 我認(rèn)為這些女孩不是隨機(jī)挑選的。這案子也涉及私人恩怨。血腥約翰要么是認(rèn)識(shí)她們，要么認(rèn)識(shí)和她們關(guān)系密切的人。