筒子們~
本次全文聽(tīng)寫(xiě)。 ~~Давай? (達(dá)瓦億)~~
Hints
two elements --book & author
an appraisal
jugdment of three aspects---statement, purpose, evidence ( 注意符號(hào):分號(hào))
then another point
First is the description of the book, not a summary. Sufficient description should be given so that the reader, as he reads the review, will have some understanding of the author's thoughts. This account of the contents of a book can often be woven into the critical remarks. Second, something about the author. Biographical information should be relevant to the subject of the review and enhance the reader's understanding of the work under discussion. Third, an appraisal, preferably indirect, through description and exposition and based on the aims and purposes of the author. While a critical review is a statement of opinion, it must be a considered judgment including, a statement of the reviewer's understanding of the author's purpose; how well the reviewer feels the author's purpose has been achieved; and evidence to support the reviewer's judgment of the author' achievement. When finishing the minimum essential of a book review, we now come to another point: preliminary mechanical steps.
首先是書(shū)本描述,不是總結(jié)。書(shū)本描述要足夠充分,這樣,讀者在閱讀書(shū)評(píng)時(shí)對(duì)作者的思想能有所理解。在這方面,通常可以對(duì)書(shū)的內(nèi)容目錄寫(xiě)一些批評(píng)言論。第二,對(duì)作者的描述。傳記信息應(yīng)該與書(shū)評(píng)主題相關(guān)聯(lián),提高讀者對(duì)著作的理解。第三,評(píng)價(jià)。最好是通過(guò)描寫(xiě)和闡述以及基于作者的目標(biāo)和目的進(jìn)行間接的評(píng)價(jià)。當(dāng)這個(gè)評(píng)論是某種意見(jiàn)的陳述時(shí),它必須是一個(gè)經(jīng)過(guò)深思熟慮的論斷,要包括評(píng)論家對(duì)作者的意圖的理解的說(shuō)明;評(píng)論家對(duì)作者的意圖所了解的程度有多深;用以支持評(píng)論家對(duì)作者的成就的判斷證據(jù)。完成書(shū)評(píng)最基本內(nèi)容之后,現(xiàn)在我們來(lái)談?wù)劻硪稽c(diǎn):準(zhǔn)備步驟。
翻譯by sugarle