政府類真題
【Many?countries?have?spent?vast?sums?of?money?on?armament?for?the?sake?of?self?defence.?Some?people?think?that?the?government?should?stop?putting?money?in?this?field.?What?is?your?opinion?】
Pat老師評語:這篇7分范文最大的亮點在于舉例。
文章略長大家耐心哈。
兒童節(jié)過后充滿活力的禮拜一喲~
童鞋們學(xué)習(xí)愉快喵~O(∩_∩)O~
Currently, the armament race is still intense among major powers, which takes up enormous sums of money and research resources. I believe national security is of vital importance to all nations. The real concern should be “How much money should be spent on national defence?"
Reasonable amounts of money should be spent on developing military technology and keeping enough soldiers to ensure the safety of a country. Take the fall of the Roman Empire as an example. Even though it was due to a variety of reasons, the most direct one was that its army was too weak to prevented from being destroyed by foreign invaders. Today, with the trend of globalization conflicts between countries are frequent. A country would not have lasting development without an effective national-defence system.
Another reason for supporting investment in national defence is that the technology developed for military use can often serve civil purposes as well. Take CDMA for example, it used to be telecommunications technology developed by the US army. But now, as it has been deployed across the world, millions of people are benefiting from the clear voice communication that it has brought.
On the other hand, there are countries that put too much money on military forces. Destructive weapons have been invented, so powerful that they can destroy the earth several times.
How much money would be reasonable for national defence budgets. It remains the question, but one thing is for sure, no country can afford to ignore its national defence.
當(dāng)前世界上各大國之間的軍備競賽還在如火如荼地進行著,耗費了大量的金錢和研究資源。我同意國家安全對每個國家來說都是頭等大事。真正的問題在于我們究竟應(yīng)該花多少錢在國防建設(shè)上。
政府當(dāng)然應(yīng)投入一部分合理的資金到開發(fā)軍事科技和保持足夠的軍隊來保證國家安全上。就拿羅馬帝國的陷落舉個例子吧。盡管羅馬的失敗是有多方面原因的,但最主要的一個原因就是羅馬帝國的軍隊過于羸弱,根本抵擋不住外國侵略者。而今天在全球化的大趨勢下,國家之間的沖突愈發(fā)頻繁。一個國家如果沒有有效的國防能力,就根本談不上持續(xù)發(fā)展。
而支持政府應(yīng)在國防上投資的另一個理由則是以軍事為目的的開發(fā)出的科技往往也能應(yīng)用到民用目的上。就像CDMA,它原本是美國軍方開發(fā)出的一種通信技術(shù)。但是如今它已經(jīng)遍布世界各地,上百萬的人們通過它享受著清晰的語音交流。
從另一個角度講,也有些國家在軍隊上花費了過多的資金。新型武器不斷被發(fā)明出來,它們的威力甚至可以摧毀地球好幾次。各國都應(yīng)該警惕這個傾向,因為它威脅世界和平與國際安全。
合理的國防預(yù)算到底應(yīng)該是多少仍然是有爭議的問題。但很顯然沒有國家可以忽視自己的國防。