本文描寫(xiě)作者應(yīng)邀為老同學(xué)解決一起與學(xué)生的物理題“糾紛”。學(xué)生不同意單一的答案，覺(jué)得自己應(yīng)該得到高分而不是零分，于是和老師協(xié)議邀請(qǐng)第三方公正的我解決問(wèn)題。

Hints：

有引號(hào)

?

小編要備考323專八，這段時(shí)間暫不更新了。大家可以聽(tīng)聽(tīng)前面的。

Finally, he concluded that while there are many ways of solving the problem , "Probably the best and the most practical in a real-life situation is to take the barometer to the basement and knock on the superintendent's door. When the superintendent answers, you speak to him as follows: Mr. Superintendent, I have here a fine barometer. If you will tell me the height of this building, I will gladly give you this barometer! " At this point, I asked the student if he really didn't know the expected answer to this question. He smiled and admitted that he did, but he said he was fed up with standard answers to standard questions. He couldn't understand why there should be so much emphasis on fixed rules rather than creative thinking. So he could not resist the temptation to play a little joke with the educational system, which had been thrown into such a panic by the successful launching of the Russian Sputnik. At that moment I suddenly remembered the question: How many angels can dance on the head of a pin? We teachers are always blaming the students for giving wrong answers. Perhaps we should ask ourselves whether we are always asking the right questions.