Some?people?believe?that?the?use?of?animals?for?experimentation?purpose?is?cruel;?others?believe?that?it?is?necessary?for?the?development?of?science.?Discuss?both?views?and?give?your?own?opinion.?

［題目講評(píng)］
　　果然又是老題換個(gè)形式之后再出，題目考前給同學(xué)講解過的（到北京來講課了，但還是總收到長(zhǎng)沙A類和G類同學(xué)們的來信，說拿到了好分?jǐn)?shù)很高興。我也很想念你們?。┻@類文章想素材當(dāng)然用咱們思考素材四類方法當(dāng)中的綜合法，相加得出觀點(diǎn)：動(dòng)物實(shí)驗(yàn)應(yīng)該繼續(xù)，但是要盡可能減小動(dòng)物的痛苦。相應(yīng)的寫四段，大正小負(fù)，當(dāng)然還是小的放在前面寫。還是那句話，考IELTS學(xué)術(shù)類寫作想拿高分或者滿分永遠(yuǎn)只要按照English?academic?writing的規(guī)則寫英文八股文就成。?

　　1?、開頭段（不少于4句）；2?、有一些動(dòng)物實(shí)驗(yàn)確實(shí)cruel（五句）；3?、但是一些領(lǐng)域的研究又不能缺少動(dòng)物實(shí)驗(yàn)（七句）；4?、綜合，得出結(jié)論（不少于3句）。創(chuàng)作全程使用IELTS作文cold?storage冷處理+assembly?line裝配法。?

［高分關(guān)鍵詞］
friends?or?foes?或敵或友?subject（vt）?animals?to?experimentation拿動(dòng)物去做實(shí)驗(yàn)unjustifiable站不住腳的,不合適的?necessitate?使……成為必需callous殘酷的?confinement?囚禁?veterinary?動(dòng)物醫(yī)療?vaccination?接種?vivisection?活體解剖?rodent?指老鼠那一類動(dòng)物?primate?靈長(zhǎng)類?pragmatic?靈活的追求實(shí)效的（pragmatism也是美國人最大的特征）pharmaceutical?companies制藥公司anthropological?and?genetic?人類學(xué)的和基因?qū)W的analgesic,?anesthetic?and?tranquilizing?drugs醫(yī)學(xué)當(dāng)中鎮(zhèn)痛最常用的三種方法?

［范文之一］
Animals?were?friends?or?foes?of?humanity?at?different?times?of?the?human?history.?In?modern?times,?experiments?upon?animals?have?long?been?a?breeding?ground?for?spirited?debate.?Some?animal?activists?argue?that?we?should?ban?animal?experiments?altogether?because?subjecting?animals?to?experimentation?is?unjustifiable?on?moral?grounds.?Yet?some?other?people?contend?that?the?advancement?of?science?necessitates?animal?testing.?Personally,?I?believe?both?their?views?have?merit?and?demerit.?

Granted,?empirical?evidence?suggests?that?many?animal?experiments?are?performed?callously?without?any?heed?to?the?discomfort?or?pain?that?laboratory?mammals?endure.?First?and?foremost,?improper?confinement?of?test?animals?such?as?locking?them?up?in?cramped?cages?or?poor?veterinary?is?inhumane?.It?can?gravely?disrupt?natural?biological?functions?of?the?test?animal.?Further,?the?effects?of?vaccination?and?vivisection?conducted?on?live?rodents,?primates?and?other?lab?mammals?can?be?gruesome?and?chilling.?They?may,?in?some?cases,?even?constitute?sheer?torture?of?live?animals.?

However,?from?a?more?pragmatic?perspective,?evidence?is?mounting?that?animal?experimentation?is?still?largely?a?necessary?evil?and?there?is?no?practical?alternative?for?it?at?this?point.?In?the?first?place,?it?is?manifest?that?drug?experimentation?on?live?mammals?is?far?more?effectual?than?experimentation?on?bacteria?or?on?other?lower?species?in?testing?drug?safety.?Drugs?that?have?severe?potential?side?effects?on?homo?sapiens?must?be?tested?by?pharmaceutical?companies?on?live?mammals?first?to?ascertain?their?toxicity.?In?the?second?place,?in?space?research,?live?animals?are?still?the?only?viable?alternative?to?humans?in?testing?living?creature?reaction?to?outer-space?experience?on?a?flight?not?considered?to?be?sufficiently?safe?for?human?astronauts.?Lastly,?lab?research?about?the?behavioral?tendencies?of?chimpanzees,?gorillas,?orangutans?and?other?members?of?the?primate?group?is?also?necessary.?It?produces?valuable?outcomes?consistently?advancing?anthropological?and?genetic?studies.?

To?conclude,?I?concede?that?experiments?upon?animals?may?induce?suffering?to?the?test?animals.?However,?I?am?convinced?that?there?are?no?feasible?alternatives?to?this?methodology?at?the?current?stage?of?scientific?development.?On?balance?,?I?think?that?we?should?allow?animals?testing?to?be?continued?but?at?the?same?time?use?techniques?such?as?analgesic,?anesthetic?and?tranquilizing?drugs?to?minimize?the?pain?inflicted?upon?the?test?animal?and?augment?the?general?welfare?of?these?animals.?（此范文作者：Patrick?Shen）?

［范文之二］
Animal?testing?has?been?applied?as?a?normal?procedure?of?scientific?research?for?years.?There?are?emerging?criticisms?arguing?that?the?sufferings?inflicted?on?laboratory?animals?are?brutal.?However,?the?progress?of?sciences?would?be?seriously?hampered?if?heavy?regulations?are?imposed?on?animal?research.?

Many?medications?and?procedures?currently?in?use?would?not?exist?if?animal?testing?was?banned.?Animal?testing?has?assisted?mankind?in?successfully?developing?vaccines?and?antibiotics.?Life-saving?techniques?such?as?organ?transplant?also?own?thanks?to?animal?research.?Such?development?in?science?has?cured?people?around?the?globe,?saving?millions?of?lives.?However,?what?could?we?use?to?achieve?comparable?results?without?animal?research??Our?science?is?not?so?advanced?that?we?could?test?a?new?drug?on?a?flower?or?tomato?before?its?clinical?application.?Of?course,?mankind?could?not?sacrifice?human?lives?for?the?purpose?of?research.?

In?comparison?to?the?costs?in?terms?of?the?sufferings?on?animals,?the?advantages?that?animal?testing?has?brought?to?humans?are?much?greater.?Human?society?is?required?to?generate?valuable?consequences,?even?at?the?cost?of?inflicting?pain?to?some?animals?whose?lives?may?be?worthy.?Nevertheless,?the?value?of?their?lives?does?not?count?as?much?as?the?value?of?human?life?because?human?beings?have?much?higher?capability?and?sensibility?than?animals.?

However,?it?is?also?true?that?pain?killers?are?not?administered?to?animals?in?many?cases?of?animal?testing.?Animals?even?as?a?lower?form?of?life?deserve?to?be?treated?with?due?humanity.?So?mankind?has?a?moral?obligation?to?decrease?the?sufferings?of?animals?within?their?power.?

In?conclusion,?animal?testing?is?crucial?as?a?procedure?of?science.?Its?elimination?would?severely?hamper?development?of?sciences.?However?mankind?should?also?do?their?best?to?decrease?the?sufferings?of?laboratory?animals.?

　　此范文作者：王軍，英語碩士，原北京新東方GRE寫作老師，美味英語俱樂部發(fā)起人，獲國際管理專業(yè)全球排名第一Thunderbird商學(xué)院全獎(jiǎng)?，F(xiàn)為高級(jí)英語教練，成功培訓(xùn)包括輝瑞制藥，鳳凰衛(wèi)視，北京電視臺(tái)等單位人員。