文章較難,大家聽寫填空即可~
Here in New York, the ___1___ state budget includes one ___2___ that’s probably making more news than the rest of the budget’s contents combined: a tax on nondiet soda and other high-calorie drinks. If the budget is passed by the legislature, sugary drinks would be ___3___ an extra penny-per-ounce excise tax. The idea is to both raise money for the state—an estimated billion dollars a year—and motivate people to consume less soda. But do higher costs really get people to eat more healthfully?
A study published in the March 8th ___4___ of the journal Archives of Internal Medicine says yes. Researchers tracked the eating habits and health of over 5,000 young adults for two decades. They found that a 10 percent increase in the price of soda was associated with a 7 percent decrease in soda calories consumed. ___5___
The higher tax is, of course, a political decision, not a scientific one. But the science does support the idea that such sin taxes accomplish their healthful intent.
pending provision slapped with issue Higher prices were also associated with lower total calorie intake, lower body weight and improved insulin resistance.
今年紐約州提交的財(cái)政預(yù)算案中有一項(xiàng)引發(fā)熱議:向汽水等高熱量飲料征收“肥胖稅”。若預(yù)算案得以通過,含糖飲料將面臨每盎司1美分的額外征稅。這將給州政府帶來每年10億美元左右的財(cái)政收入,同時(shí)敦促人們減少汽水消費(fèi)。然而漲價(jià)是否真能使消費(fèi)者望而卻步,轉(zhuǎn)而支持健康飲食呢? 3月8日《內(nèi)科醫(yī)學(xué)檔案》發(fā)布的一項(xiàng)調(diào)查(作者凱亞?達(dá)菲等,O)給出了肯定的答案。研究人員就5000余年輕人10年間的飲食習(xí)慣及健康狀況進(jìn)行了跟蹤調(diào)查。結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)當(dāng)汽水價(jià)格上漲10%,人們從汽水中攝取的卡路里就減少7%。這一舉措同樣導(dǎo)致人們卡路里攝取量普遍下降,體重減輕,胰島素耐受性得到改善。 當(dāng)然,增稅是一項(xiàng)政治決策,而非科學(xué)舉措。但科學(xué)家無疑支持這類為了人類健康而征收的“罪過稅”。