It’s tough to hold on to good employees, but it shouldn’t be. Most of the mistakes that companies make are easily avoided. When you do make mistakes, your best employees are the first to go, because they have the most options.
留住好員工不容易,但不應(yīng)該讓它成為困難。大多數(shù)的公司所犯的錯(cuò)誤都是很容易避免的。如果你真的犯錯(cuò)了,你的優(yōu)秀員工們肯定是第一個(gè)離開的,因?yàn)樗麄冇凶疃嗟某雎贰?/div>

If you can’t keep your best employees engaged, you can’t keep your best employees. While this should be common sense, it isn’t common enough. A survey by CEB found that one-third of star employees feel disengaged from their employer and are already looking for a new job.
如果你無法讓最好的員工們專心工作,你就不能留住他們。雖然這應(yīng)該是常識(shí),但是也沒有那么常見。CEB公司進(jìn)行的一項(xiàng)調(diào)查顯示,1/3的星級(jí)員工感到不受雇主重視,并且早已開始找新的工作了。

When you lose good employees, they don’t disengage all at once. Instead, their interest in their jobs slowly dissipates. Michael Kibler, who has spent much of his career studying this phenomenon, refers to it as brownout. Like dying stars, star employees slowly lose their fire for their jobs.
當(dāng)你失去了優(yōu)秀的員工,他們不會(huì)全部立即離開。反之,他們對(duì)于工作的興趣會(huì)緩慢地消散。Michael Kible利用了他的職業(yè)生涯大部分時(shí)間來研究這種現(xiàn)象,并稱之為工作動(dòng)力減退。就像正在熄滅的星星一樣,星級(jí)員工會(huì)慢慢地失去工作上的火花。

“Brownout is different from burnout because workers afflicted by it are not in obvious crisis,” Kibler said. “They seem to be performing fine: putting in massive hours, grinding out work while contributing to teams, and saying all the right things in meetings. However, they are operating in a silent state of continual overwhelm, and the predictable consequence is disengagement.”
“動(dòng)力減退有別于職業(yè)倦怠,因?yàn)槭芷湔勰サ膯T工們并非處于一個(gè)明顯的危機(jī)之中?!盞ibler表示。“他們看起來表現(xiàn)得很不錯(cuò):投入大量時(shí)間,在工作上不斷打磨的同時(shí)為團(tuán)隊(duì)做貢獻(xiàn),還在會(huì)議期間說正確的話。然而,他們正在靜音狀態(tài)下持續(xù)大量地工作,你可預(yù)測(cè)到的后果就是離職。”

In order to prevent brownout and to retain top talent, companies and managers must understand what they’re doing that contributes to this slow fade. The following practices are the worst offenders, and they must be abolished if you’re going to hang on to good employees.
為了避免動(dòng)力減退的情況,留在優(yōu)秀人才,許多公司和管理者都必須了解到他們的哪些行為會(huì)導(dǎo)致這種緩慢的退步。下面的做法是最糟糕的,如果你想要留住好員工就必須摒棄它們。

1. They make a lot of stupid rules.
1. 設(shè)定種種愚蠢的規(guī)則。

Companies need to have rules—that’s a given—but they don’t have to be shortsighted and lazy attempts at creating order. Whether it’s an overzealous attendance policy or taking employees’ frequent flier miles, even a couple of unnecessary rules can drive people crazy. When good employees feel like big brother is watching, they’ll find someplace else to work.
公司都需要規(guī)則——是必須的——但不能是目光短淺的,懶得保持秩序的。不管這是一份過度熱心的考勤政策還是記錄員工的里程數(shù),即使是幾條無關(guān)要緊的規(guī)則都會(huì)讓人發(fā)瘋。當(dāng)員工們感到被管理層盯著工作,他們就會(huì)找別的工作。

2. They treat everyone equally.
2. 一視同仁。

While this tactic works with school children, the workplace ought to function differently. Treating everyone equally shows your top performers that no matter how high they perform (and, typically, top performers are work horses), they will be treated the same as the bozo who does nothing more than punch the clock.
雖然這個(gè)策略對(duì)學(xué)校的孩子們很有效,但是職場(chǎng)里就應(yīng)該差別對(duì)待。一視同仁只會(huì)顯示不管你的優(yōu)秀員工們表現(xiàn)有多么出色(以及通常來說,優(yōu)秀員工們都是驢子),他們就會(huì)視為敲鐘的笨蛋。

3. They tolerate poor performance.
3. 容忍差勁的工作表現(xiàn)。

It’s said that in jazz bands, the band is only as good as the worst player; no matter how great some members may be, everyone hears the worst player. The same goes for a company. When you permit weak links to exist without consequence, they drag everyone else down, especially your top performers.
據(jù)說,在爵士樂隊(duì)里,樂隊(duì)的好壞取決于最差勁的樂手,不管有的成員多么出色,人們只會(huì)留意最差勁的那個(gè)。同樣的道理適用于公司機(jī)構(gòu)。當(dāng)你允許毫無成果的薄弱底線,他們就會(huì)拖別人的后腿,特別是你的優(yōu)秀員工們。

4. They don’t recognize accomplishments.
4. 不懂得認(rèn)可他人的成績(jī)。

It’s easy to underestimate the power of a pat on the back, especially with top performers who are intrinsically motivated. Everyone likes kudos, none more so than those who work hard and give their all. Rewarding individual accomplishments shows that you’re paying attention. Managers need to communicate with their people to find out what makes them feel good (for some, it’s a raise; for others, it’s public recognition) and then to reward them for a job well done. With top performers, this will happen often if you’re doing it right.
管理者很容易低估表揚(yáng)的力量,尤其是低估那些很需要激勵(lì)的優(yōu)秀員工的作用。每個(gè)人都喜歡獎(jiǎng)?wù)?,沒有比那些辛苦工作,傾其所有的人更需要了。獎(jiǎng)勵(lì)個(gè)人成就意味著你留意到了他們。管理者需要與員工們溝通,找出讓他們感覺良好的因素(對(duì)于一些人來說,就是加薪;對(duì)于另一些人來說,就是公開的認(rèn)可)然后褒獎(jiǎng)他們的出色工作。對(duì)于優(yōu)秀的員工們來說,如果你處理得當(dāng),這件事情會(huì)常常發(fā)生。

5. They don’t care about people.
5. 他們不在乎人的感受。

More than half the people who leave their jobs do so because of their relationship with their boss. Smart companies make certain that their managers know how to balance being professional with being human. These are the bosses who celebrate their employees’ successes, empathize with those going through hard times, and challenge them, even when it hurts. Bosses who fail to really care will always have high turnover rates. It’s impossible to work for someone for eight-plus hours a day when they aren’t personally involved and don’t care about anything other than your output.
超過一半的人離職是因?yàn)樗麄兣c老板的關(guān)系不好。明智的公司會(huì)確定他們的管理層懂得如何平衡專業(yè)性與人性化。這些就是老板懂得為員工成就慶祝的做法,在困難的時(shí)期懂得同情員工,甚至在傷心的時(shí)期懂得挑戰(zhàn)他們。不在乎他人的老板總有很高的員工離職率。對(duì)于工作8小時(shí)以上的人們來說,無法跟那些不懂關(guān)照他人,只在乎產(chǎn)出的老板長期工作。

6. They don’t show people the big picture.
6. 不給員工展示宏觀狀況。

It may seem efficient to simply send employees assignments and move on, but leaving out the big picture is a deal breaker for star performers. Star performers shoulder heavier loads because they genuinely care about their work, so their work must have a purpose. When they don’t know what that is, they feel alienated and aimless. When they aren’t given a purpose, they find one elsewhere.
似乎僅僅給員工們分配任務(wù)并繼續(xù)運(yùn)作是很有效率的事情,但是給優(yōu)秀員工展示宏觀狀況是影響大局的事情。星級(jí)員工肩負(fù)重?fù)?dān)因?yàn)樗麄冋嫘脑诤踝约旱墓ぷ?,所以他們的工作必須有一個(gè)明確的目標(biāo)。如果他們不知道這個(gè)目標(biāo)是什么,他們會(huì)感到不受重視,漫無目的。當(dāng)他們的目標(biāo)不明確,他們就會(huì)從別處尋找。

7. They don’t let people pursue their passions.
7. 不讓人們追求自己的理想。

Google mandates that employees spend at least 20% of their time doing “what they believe will benefit Google most.” While these passion projects make major contributions to marquis Google products, such as Gmail and AdSense, their biggest impact is in creating highly engaged Googlers. Talented employees are passionate. Providing opportunities for them to pursue their passions improves their productivity and job satisfaction, but many managers want people to work within a little box. These managers fear that productivity will decline if they let people expand their focus and pursue their passions. This fear is unfounded. Studies have shown that people who are able to pursue their passions at work experience flow, a euphoric state of mind that is five times more productive than the norm.
谷歌要求員工至少花20%的時(shí)間做著“他們認(rèn)為對(duì)谷歌最有益的事情”。雖然這些理想項(xiàng)目對(duì)于谷歌的經(jīng)典產(chǎn)品做出了關(guān)鍵的貢獻(xiàn),例如Gmail和AdSense,但是他們最大的影響力在于培養(yǎng)高度投入的谷歌人。人才都是激情滿滿的。為他們提供追求理想的機(jī)會(huì)能夠提高工作效率和職業(yè)滿意度,但是許多管理者希望人們?cè)谝粋€(gè)小框子里工作。如果讓員工拓展自己的工作重心和追求理想的話,這些管理者會(huì)害怕工作效率下降。這種恐懼是站不住腳的。有許多研究表明,在累積工作經(jīng)驗(yàn)的過程中能夠追求自己理想的員工,他們憑著愉悅的精神狀態(tài)能夠比按照慣例工作的員工高出5倍的工作效率。

8. They don’t make things fun.
8. 不懂得制造趣味。

If people aren’t having fun at work, then you’re doing it wrong. People don’t give their all if they aren’t having fun, and fun is a major protector against brownout. The best companies to work for know the importance of letting employees loosen up a little. Google, for example, does just about everything it can to make work fun—free meals, bowling allies, and fitness classes, to name a few. The idea is simple: if work is fun, you’ll not only perform better, but you’ll stick around for longer hours and an even longer career.
如果人們?cè)诠ぷ魃蠜]有趣味,那么你們的方法就是錯(cuò)誤的了。人們?nèi)绻械椒ξ叮筒粫?huì)傾其所有,趣味性是對(duì)抗動(dòng)力倒退的重要守護(hù)者。最值得員工去工作的公司了解到讓員工稍稍放松的重要性。舉例來說,谷歌公司,盡其所能讓一切變得有趣——免費(fèi)的餐飲,保齡球隊(duì),還有健身課程,這里這是其中一些。這個(gè)概念很簡(jiǎn)單:如果工作是有趣的,你不僅表現(xiàn)得更好,還會(huì)停留更長的時(shí)間,甚至是更長久的職業(yè)生涯。

Bringing It All Together
總結(jié)

Managers tend to blame their turnover problems on everything under the sun while ignoring the crux of the matter: people don’t leave jobs; they leave managers. Want to make your organization a better place to work? Consider attending an emotional intelligence certification where you’ll learn how to create a high-EQ workplace.
管理者們傾向于把他們的員工流失問題歸罪于天下間所有的事情,卻忽略了問題的關(guān)鍵:人們不會(huì)離工作而去,他們只會(huì)離管理者而去。想要讓你的公司變得更適宜工作嗎?考慮參與一次情商資格證的課程,你就會(huì)學(xué)習(xí)如果營造高情商的職場(chǎng)環(huán)境了。

聲明:本雙語文章的中文翻譯系滬江英語原創(chuàng)內(nèi)容,轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處。中文翻譯僅代表譯者個(gè)人觀點(diǎn),僅供參考。如有不妥之處,歡迎指正。